This is the demo portfolio. Nothing here is real, and nothing can be saved.

Yarrow House

Regulation 44 visit, 3 January 2026

Submitted to OfstedUnannouncedSCCIF (children's homes), April 2026Submitted 6 January 2026

Opinion

Are children effectively safeguarded?
Safeguarding records reviewed in full; concerns were escalated appropriately and in time.
Yes
Does the conduct of the home promote children's wellbeing?
Children report feeling settled, but the concerns above are recurring and affect daily life.
Partially

The visit

Spoke with LW and with staff FN, NF, SJ. Sampled the case files of FC. Reviewed 13 areas: physical intervention and restraint, missing from home episodes, complaints, sanctions and consequences, safeguarding concerns and referrals, regulation 40 notifications, children's views, medication management, education attendance and progress, health appointments and records, staff training and qualifications, family time and contact, location risk assessment.

Findings

2 concerns, 4 strengths. Every finding records what was looked at, what was found, and why it matters.

  • Physical intervention and restraint

    Concern
    Looked at
    All physical intervention records since the last visit; debrief forms.
    Found
    Debrief with the child missing on one record.
    Why it matters
    Without manager review, patterns in use of force go unchallenged.
    Action
    Raised as a recommendation, tracked on the home’s timeline.
  • Education attendance and progress

    Concern
    Looked at
    Attendance registers; PEPs; correspondence with school.
    Found
    One child attending three days a week; no recorded plan to increase.
    Why it matters
    Reduced attendance narrows the child's options and increases time unsupervised.
    Action
    Raised as a recommendation, tracked on the home’s timeline.
  • Missing from home episodes

    Strength
    Looked at
    Missing episode log; return-home interview records; police notifications.
    Found
    Return-home interviews offered and recorded for every episode.
    Why it matters
    Supports the standard; no action required.
  • Complaints

    Strength
    Looked at
    Complaints log and responses.
    Found
    Complaints responded to within policy timescale; outcomes explained to children.
    Why it matters
    Supports the standard; no action required.
  • Medication management

    Strength
    Looked at
    MAR sheets for all children; controlled drug register; stock count.
    Found
    MAR sheets complete; stock reconciles.
    Why it matters
    Supports the standard; no action required.
  • Staff training and qualifications

    Strength
    Looked at
    Training matrix; certificates for three staff.
    Found
    Training matrix current; all mandatory training in date.
    Why it matters
    Supports the standard; no action required.