This is the demo portfolio. Nothing here is real, and nothing can be saved.

Campion Place

Regulation 44 visit, 4 January 2026

Submitted to OfstedAnnouncedSCCIF (children's homes), April 2026Submitted 7 January 2026

Opinion

Are children effectively safeguarded?
Safeguarding records reviewed in full; concerns were escalated appropriately and in time.
Partially
Does the conduct of the home promote children's wellbeing?
Children report feeling settled, but the concerns above are recurring and affect daily life.
Partially

The visit

Spoke with no children and with staff DF, LG. Sampled the case files of no children. Reviewed 9 areas: physical intervention and restraint, missing from home episodes, complaints, regulation 40 notifications, children's views, education attendance and progress, staff supervision, children's meetings, safeguarding concerns and referrals.

Findings

3 concerns, 2 strengths. Every finding records what was looked at, what was found, and why it matters.

  • Physical intervention and restraint

    Concern
    Looked at
    All physical intervention records since the last visit; debrief forms.
    Found
    Two records lack a manager review signature.
    Why it matters
    Without manager review, patterns in use of force go unchallenged.
    Action
    Raised as a recommendation, tracked on the home’s timeline.
  • Complaints

    Concern
    Looked at
    Complaints log and responses.
    Found
    One complaint from a child has no recorded outcome after 21 days.
    Why it matters
    A child whose complaint goes unanswered learns that speaking up doesn't work.
    Action
    Raised as a recommendation, tracked on the home’s timeline.
  • Education attendance and progress

    Concern
    Looked at
    Attendance registers; PEPs; correspondence with school.
    Found
    One child attending three days a week; no recorded plan to increase.
    Why it matters
    Reduced attendance narrows the child's options and increases time unsupervised.
    Action
    Raised as a recommendation, tracked on the home’s timeline.
  • Missing from home episodes

    Strength
    Looked at
    Missing episode log; return-home interview records; police notifications.
    Found
    Return-home interviews offered and recorded for every episode.
    Why it matters
    Supports the standard; no action required.
  • Staff supervision

    Strength
    Looked at
    Supervision records for four staff selected at random.
    Found
    Supervision at monthly frequency for all staff sampled.
    Why it matters
    Supports the standard; no action required.