This is the demo portfolio. Nothing here is real, and nothing can be saved.

Foxglove House

Regulation 44 visit, 7 May 2026

Submitted to OfstedUnannouncedSCCIF (children's homes), April 2026Submitted 10 May 2026

Opinion

Are children effectively safeguarded?
Safeguarding records reviewed in full; concerns were escalated appropriately and in time.
Yes
Does the conduct of the home promote children's wellbeing?
Children report feeling settled, but the concerns above are recurring and affect daily life.
Partially

The visit

Spoke with KM, BG and with staff GC, CS. Sampled the case files of BG. Reviewed 12 areas: physical intervention and restraint, missing from home episodes, complaints, sanctions and consequences, safeguarding concerns and referrals, regulation 40 notifications, children's views, children's case files and care plans, individual risk assessments, medication management, education attendance and progress, premises and environment.

Progress against previous recommendations

  • Ensure every physical intervention record is reviewed and signed by the manager within 72 hours

    Raised 15 Dec, due 29 Dec. Owner WL.

    Records attached for review.

    Evidence offered

Findings

2 concerns, 4 strengths. Every finding records what was looked at, what was found, and why it matters.

  • Medication management

    Concern
    Looked at
    MAR sheets for all children; controlled drug register; stock count.
    Found
    Controlled drug count discrepancy of one tablet unresolved since last month.
    Why it matters
    An unresolved discrepancy in controlled drugs is a safeguarding risk and a notifiable matter.
    Action
    Raised as a recommendation, tracked on the home’s timeline.
  • Education attendance and progress

    Concern
    Looked at
    Attendance registers; PEPs; correspondence with school.
    Found
    One child attending three days a week; no recorded plan to increase.
    Why it matters
    Reduced attendance narrows the child's options and increases time unsupervised.
    Action
    Raised as a recommendation, tracked on the home’s timeline.
  • Physical intervention and restraint

    Strength
    Looked at
    All physical intervention records since the last visit; debrief forms.
    Found
    All records include a debrief with the child within 24 hours.
    Why it matters
    Supports the standard; no action required.
  • Missing from home episodes

    Strength
    Looked at
    Missing episode log; return-home interview records; police notifications.
    Found
    Return-home interviews offered and recorded for every episode.
    Why it matters
    Supports the standard; no action required.
  • Complaints

    Strength
    Looked at
    Complaints log and responses.
    Found
    Complaints responded to within policy timescale; outcomes explained to children.
    Why it matters
    Supports the standard; no action required.
  • Premises and environment

    Strength
    Looked at
    Walk-round of all communal areas and two bedrooms with consent.
    Found
    Home is clean, well maintained and homely; children have personalised their rooms.
    Why it matters
    Supports the standard; no action required.