This is the demo portfolio. Nothing here is real, and nothing can be saved.

Foxglove House

Regulation 44 visit, 6 October 2025

Submitted to OfstedUnannouncedSCCIF (children's homes), April 2026Submitted 9 October 2025

Opinion

Are children effectively safeguarded?
Safeguarding records reviewed in full; concerns were escalated appropriately and in time.
Partially
Does the conduct of the home promote children's wellbeing?
Children report feeling settled, but the concerns above are recurring and affect daily life.
Partially

The visit

Spoke with KM and with staff PE, RR. Sampled the case files of KM. Reviewed 12 areas: physical intervention and restraint, missing from home episodes, complaints, sanctions and consequences, safeguarding concerns and referrals, regulation 40 notifications, children's views, medication management, education attendance and progress, staff supervision, family time and contact, premises and environment.

Findings

4 concerns, 3 strengths. Every finding records what was looked at, what was found, and why it matters.

  • Physical intervention and restraint

    Concern
    Looked at
    All physical intervention records since the last visit; debrief forms.
    Found
    Two records lack a manager review signature.
    Why it matters
    Without manager review, patterns in use of force go unchallenged.
    Action
    Raised as a recommendation, tracked on the home’s timeline.
  • Missing from home episodes

    Concern
    Looked at
    Missing episode log; return-home interview records; police notifications.
    Found
    Pattern of episodes on Friday evenings not yet analysed by the manager.
    Why it matters
    Unanalysed patterns mean risk assessments are not reflecting real behaviour.
    Action
    Raised as a recommendation, tracked on the home’s timeline.
  • Education attendance and progress

    Concern
    Looked at
    Attendance registers; PEPs; correspondence with school.
    Found
    One child attending three days a week; no recorded plan to increase.
    Why it matters
    Reduced attendance narrows the child's options and increases time unsupervised.
    Action
    Raised as a recommendation, tracked on the home’s timeline.
  • Premises and environment

    Concern
    Looked at
    Walk-round of all communal areas and two bedrooms with consent.
    Found
    Bathroom lock reported broken last month is still not repaired.
    Why it matters
    A bathroom without a working lock compromises privacy and dignity.
    Action
    Raised as a recommendation, tracked on the home’s timeline.
  • Complaints

    Strength
    Looked at
    Complaints log and responses.
    Found
    Complaints responded to within policy timescale; outcomes explained to children.
    Why it matters
    Supports the standard; no action required.
  • Medication management

    Strength
    Looked at
    MAR sheets for all children; controlled drug register; stock count.
    Found
    MAR sheets complete; stock reconciles.
    Why it matters
    Supports the standard; no action required.
  • Staff supervision

    Strength
    Looked at
    Supervision records for four staff selected at random.
    Found
    Supervision at monthly frequency for all staff sampled.
    Why it matters
    Supports the standard; no action required.