This is the demo portfolio. Nothing here is real, and nothing can be saved.

Yarrow Cottage

Regulation 44 visit, 3 August 2026

Submitted to OfstedUnannouncedSCCIF (children's homes), April 2026Submitted 6 August 2026

Opinion

Are children effectively safeguarded?
Safeguarding records reviewed in full; concerns were escalated appropriately and in time.
Yes
Does the conduct of the home promote children's wellbeing?
Children report feeling settled, but the concerns above are recurring and affect daily life.
Partially

The visit

Spoke with GW, TC and with staff BA, WD, RN. Sampled the case files of GW, TC. Reviewed 11 areas: missing from home episodes, complaints, safeguarding concerns and referrals, regulation 40 notifications, education attendance and progress, staff supervision, key-work and one-to-one sessions, activities, interests and time outside the home, fire safety, health and safety checks, physical intervention and restraint.

Findings

2 concerns, 4 strengths. Every finding records what was looked at, what was found, and why it matters.

  • Missing from home episodes

    Concern
    Looked at
    Missing episode log; return-home interview records; police notifications.
    Found
    Pattern of episodes on Friday evenings not yet analysed by the manager.
    Why it matters
    Unanalysed patterns mean risk assessments are not reflecting real behaviour.
    Action
    Raised as a recommendation, tracked on the home’s timeline.
  • Education attendance and progress

    Concern
    Looked at
    Attendance registers; PEPs; correspondence with school.
    Found
    One child attending three days a week; no recorded plan to increase.
    Why it matters
    Reduced attendance narrows the child's options and increases time unsupervised.
    Action
    Raised as a recommendation, tracked on the home’s timeline.
  • Complaints

    Strength
    Looked at
    Complaints log and responses.
    Found
    Complaints responded to within policy timescale; outcomes explained to children.
    Why it matters
    Supports the standard; no action required.
  • Staff supervision

    Strength
    Looked at
    Supervision records for four staff selected at random.
    Found
    Supervision at monthly frequency for all staff sampled.
    Why it matters
    Supports the standard; no action required.
  • Fire safety

    Strength
    Looked at
    Fire log book; drill records; fire risk assessment.
    Found
    Drills recorded monthly; alarm tests weekly.
    Why it matters
    Supports the standard; no action required.
  • Physical intervention and restraint

    Strength
    Looked at
    All physical intervention records since the last visit; debrief forms.
    Found
    All records include a debrief with the child within 24 hours.
    Why it matters
    Supports the standard; no action required.